
Metal Oxide Electrode Failure Mechanism
The attenuation of metal oxide electrode activity occurs at the active layer/electrolyte interface and the substrate/active interface. With the progress of electrolysis, the anode coating gradually falls off, and the titanium substrate is passivated in some weak places. The catalytic activity of the electrode gradually weakens until it loses its activity completely,
Product Introduction
The degradation of metal oxide electrodes primarily occurs at two critical interfaces:
the active coating/electrolyte interface, and
the substrate/active coating interface.
During prolonged electrolysis, the anode coating gradually deteriorates and detaches, while the titanium substrate becomes locally passivated. As a result, the electrocatalytic activity continuously decreases until the electrode is completely deactivated.
Figure 1.3 illustrates the degradation process:
(a) Before electrolysis
(b) During electrolysis
(c) After deactivation
1 – Titanium substrate
2 – Active coating
3 – TiO₂ passive layer
Main Failure Mechanisms
1. Dissolution of RuO₂ (Electrocatalytic Component Loss)
In ruthenium-based coatings, RuO₂ is the primary electrocatalytic material. Under anodic polarization, RuO₂ can be oxidized into volatile RuO₄:
The generated RuO₄ may dissolve in the electrolyte (e.g., as hydrated species), and further decomposes:
This process leads to gradual loss of RuO₂ from the coating, reducing the number of active catalytic sites and causing electrode deactivation.
Studies (including those from Tianjin University) confirm that electrochemical dissolution of Ru components is a dominant failure mechanism.
Two dissolution patterns are typically observed:
- Uniform dissolution across the electrode surface
- Localized dissolution, often at edges or weak regions
When the remaining active coating drops to approximately 18% of the surface, electrode passivation occurs.
Additionally, in acidic environments (e.g., 5 mol/L H₂SO₄ at 40°C), the combined dissolution of RuO₂ and TiO₂ can form a void layer, accelerating coating failure.
2. Loss of Catalytic Activity (Oxygen Vacancy Mechanism)
The RuO₂–TiO₂ coating is typically non-stoichiometric (RuO₂₋ₓ, TiO₂₋ₓ), containing oxygen vacancies that serve as active catalytic sites.
Higher oxygen vacancy concentration → higher catalytic activity
Filling of vacancies (oxygen incorporation) → loss of activity
After heat treatment, the coating forms an n-type conductive mixed oxide structure. However, when oxygen vacancies are eliminated:
Electrical conductivity decreases
Overpotential increases
Electrode becomes passivated
Experimental studies show that:
Removing absorbed oxygen (via vacuum or inert atmosphere treatment) can partially restore electrode activity
Structural transformation of RuO₂ into less active oxides also contributes to degradation
3. Oxidation and Passivation of Titanium Substrate
During electrolysis, active oxygen species are generated at the anode:
Part escapes as O₂
Part diffuses through the coating to the substrate interface
At the substrate:
Oxygen reacts with titanium to form a TiO₂ passive layer
This layer acts as a high-resistance barrier (P–N junction-like effect)
Electron transfer is hindered → electrode potential increases
Additionally, the coating typically exhibits a "mud-crack" (tortoise-shell) structure, which:
Allows electrolyte penetration
Exposes the titanium substrate
Accelerates oxidation and coating detachment
This creates a feedback loop:
Substrate oxidation
Coating delamination
Increased anode potential
Accelerated coating dissolution and further oxidation
Coating Failure Morphologies
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) reveals several typical failure patterns:
1. Fragmented Peeling
Partial detachment along cracks
Deep pits reaching the substrate
Severe structural breakdown
2. Bulging Layer Delamination
Convex "blister-like" peeling
Uneven fracture edges
Visible surrounding crack patterns
3. Crack-Induced Spalling
Multiple microcracks connect into larger cracks
Deep, winding fissures develop
Leads to large-area coating detachment
Summary of Failure Mechanism
The degradation of MMO titanium anodes is the result of combined chemical and physical effects:
Chemical dissolution of active components (RuO₂)
Loss of catalytic activity due to structural changes
Oxidation and passivation of titanium substrate
Mechanical stress and crack propagation
Improvement Strategies
Based on the failure mechanisms, the following optimizations are recommended:
Enhance coating–substrate adhesion (to prevent peeling)
Optimize coating composition to improve corrosion resistance
Control crack formation during coating preparation
Reduce oxygen penetration to protect the substrate
Use multi-layer or gradient coatings for improved durability
Hot Tags:
You Might Also Like
Send Inquiry






